<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Historic Flight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://historicflight.org/hf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://historicflight.org/hf</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 May 2012 14:18:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The 70th Doolittle Raider Reunion, Outbound</title>
		<link>http://historicflight.org/hf/2012/04/23/the-70th-doolittle-raider-reunion-outbound/</link>
		<comments>http://historicflight.org/hf/2012/04/23/the-70th-doolittle-raider-reunion-outbound/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicflight.org/hf/?p=1032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We tracked throughout departure Saturday, the 14th, the historic tornadoes in the Midwest. They seemed ahead of schedule but like most big storms, back stages also are ugly. On Sunday, we awakened to snow and forecast ceilings under 300 feet. That’s about four wingspans, not to mention illegal without an IFR clearance, which we chose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We tracked throughout departure Saturday, the 14th, the historic tornadoes in the Midwest.  They seemed ahead of schedule but like most big storms, back stages also are ugly.  On Sunday, we awakened to snow and forecast ceilings under 300 feet.  That’s about four wingspans, not to mention illegal without an IFR clearance, which we chose to forego due to icing and turbulence.  So we spent Sunday exploring the museums and sites of Great Falls, Montana.</p>
<p>In our structured, scheduled world, an unexpected “day off” can be an exceptional experience.  Our crew adapted nicely, especially when we learned that we would be welcome at the hangar ceremony honoring Cpl. Antonio Burnside.</p>
<p>For those of you who have not witnessed the return of a fallen soldier, the ceremony moves one in many emotional directions.  Cpl. Burnside’s return from Afghanistan, where he was killed in a firefight, had the added element of Blackfeet Indian tradition.  Due to windy, cold weather, the casket was removed from the charter aircraft inside a hangar with approximately 150 members of the Blackfeet Nation and several Army personnel present.  The Council Chief made remarks and offered prayers in two languages, and dancers and singers in full dress paid tribute.  Cpl. Burnside’s grandfather lead prayers and songs, then announced that he was relocating to the reservation from his home in Canada to help the family in its transition.  He then introduced Cpl. Burnside’s wife and four children.  Given the history of Indian treatment, the pure patriotism of those present was nothing less than remarkable.  An extended motorcade accompanied Cpl. Burnside to Conrad, Montana for burial mid-week.  Just another example of sacred experiences one can have when delayed during a cross-country adventure.</p>
<p>While the weather forecast was much improved for Monday, the 16th, one must be skeptical in the lee of such a tremendous storm.  Microsystems of residual low pressure and moisture can ruin your day.  We departed in beautiful snow and 31-degrees, but as we approached the Little Big Horn, a planned waypoint, visibility deteriorated in a hurry, as it did for George Armstrong Custer on the afternoon of the historic battle when Indian horses kicked up quite a dust cloud.  We turned to the west for the improved visibility it offered and worked our way gradually to South Dakota where we found a stratified layer of clouds about 2,000 feet above the ground and visibility that seemed to extend to Dayton.  Following a fuel stop in Omaha, we continued on the final leg to Grimes Field near Dayton where the B-25s had assembled to begin formal activities the following day.  Some of you may have tracked our progress.  The winds had been howling all day and as we made our approach to Grimes, we prepared for wind shear.  We came in high with extra power, floated like a ten-ton kite, and landed on the 4,000-foot runway.  A joyful crowd witnessed a landing at sunset of Mitchell 20, “Grumpy,” the B-25 traveling the greatest distance.</p>
<p>Overnight, we were promoted to “Raider 5” for the sequenced takeoffs at sunrise.  As we fired up and made our way to the takeoff point in a long line of Mitchells, I felt grateful for the sound and performance of our engines.  Several Mitchells sounded rough and others were coughing flames.  </p>
<p>A large crowd gathered at Grimes Field for a sight not replicated since WW II.  Once in the air, we sought and received permission to pass abeam Wright Patterson Air Base and land at Wright Field.  On the ground at Wright Field, home of the Museum of the United States Air Force, we waited for no. 20 to land, then taxied to a line-up for display.  Before shutting down all 20 Mitchells performed simultaneous “run ups” to takeoff power; this, for a recording.  The 40 Wright Cyclone engines were deafening.</p>
<p>So those are a few thoughts regarding the outbound segment.  Next, I will write about the Doolittle Raider Reunion and the trip home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://historicflight.org/hf/2012/04/23/the-70th-doolittle-raider-reunion-outbound/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hornet II</title>
		<link>http://historicflight.org/hf/2012/04/23/hornet-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://historicflight.org/hf/2012/04/23/hornet-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicflight.org/hf/?p=1029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of our recent communications suggested that on May 5th, &#8220;Grumpy&#8221; will fly over the USS Hornet, from which the Doolittle Raiders launched on April 18, 1942. While the carrier docked at Alameda Point in San Francisco Bay is the USS Hornet, it is not the same one that played a crucial role in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of our recent communications suggested that on May 5th, &#8220;Grumpy&#8221; will fly over the USS Hornet, from which the Doolittle Raiders launched on April 18, 1942.  While the carrier docked at Alameda Point in San Francisco Bay is the USS Hornet, it is not the same one that played a crucial role in the Doolittle Raid.  That USS Hornet, CV-8, was sunk by the Japanese on 26 October 1942.   According to a well informed member, the surviving Hornet is CV-12 which was originally intended to be the USS Kearsarge, but was re-named &#8220;Hornet&#8221; prior to commissioning.  The surviving Hornet has been converted to a floating museum and is used by the Doolittle Foundation to commemorate the Raid.  I apologize for the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://historicflight.org/hf/2012/04/23/hornet-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DC-3 Riddle</title>
		<link>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/12/15/dc-3-riddle/</link>
		<comments>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/12/15/dc-3-riddle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicflight.org/hf/?p=908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is in tribute to David Dunstan. He personifies excellence in heritage aviation because he can do the work and he cares about the history. He was asked to reconcile conflicting information and discovered an erroneous data plate. If you maintain these treasures long enough, you will encounter an erroneous data plate. So, without [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post is in tribute to David Dunstan.  He personifies excellence in heritage aviation because he can do the work and he cares about the history.  He was asked to reconcile conflicting information and discovered an erroneous data plate.  If you maintain these treasures long enough, you will encounter an erroneous data plate.  So, without further adieu, please enjoy an email recently received at HFF.</p>
<p>Dear Sir</p>
<p>My name is David Dunstan and I am employed at Sealand Aviation. Bill Alder asked me to contact you regarding the serial number history we found on the DC3, N877MG. </p>
<p>When I started the maintenance/repairs to N877MG, I tried to identify the aircraft by SN/model to ensure that we had the correct service, parts and repair manuals. I found that the number on the data plate was not reliable, and I dug a little further into the possibilities of various SNs that were thought to be this aircraft. The following is a compilation of the facts.</p>
<p>No C47/DC3 can have a Douglas Factory issued SN of 4193. Douglas Co. skipped SNs 4184 &#8211; 4199.<br />
The actual data plate is a legitimate Douglas plate, however a C47/DC3 should be stamped with Long Beach, California, or the Oklahoma City, Oklahoma plant details. The current data plate is stamped with the Santa Monica, California plant details.<br />
N877MG&#8217;s construct has a bolted empennage at STA 596&#8243;, a feature of C47/DC3s produced only at the Long Beach plant.<br />
Internally the aircraft has more base systems in common with a C47/DC3 conversion than any other variant of the type (Super DC3,R4D-,etc), however the airframe has been heavily modified with systems from other variants and STC&#8217;s over time.<br />
The Date of Manufacture stated on the data plate is quite plausible, as 4 C47B&#8217;s were &#8220;built&#8221; that date (SN&#8217;s 20805, 20806, 20808, 20816).<br />
The symbol on the right hand outer wing is a stylized &#8220;Chung&#8221;, Chinese for middle of/central. </p>
<p>Of the several possibilities of SN that this aircraft could be, it is almost certainly SN 20806. This follows that the aircraft was built at the Long Beach, California plant on the Date of Manufacture on the data plate, 7-29-44 (SN 25638 was a R4D-6 built in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 3 weeks later than the data plate Date of Manufacture). SN 4193 is not a recognized Douglas SN, however SN 20806 had a Long Beach Factory Fuselage (Line Number) of 4193. In Douglas&#8217;s Record of Airplanes, SN 20806 and the preceding 3 aircraft SNs were to be delivered to the U.S. Army, China. Anecdotal evidence suggest that the aircraft went to the Central Air Command (China), where the aircraft was painted with this symbol to display its deployment. This aircraft was then sold some time in the late 1940&#8242;s and returned to the U.S. sometime in the early 1950&#8242;s, where it was converted by Grand Central Aircraft Co. I suggest that this aircraft returned to the U.S. minus the data plate or legible records (poor record keeping) from China, was converted and re data plated (with incorrect SN) by or before Grand Central Aircraft.</p>
<p>I hope this helpful with the FAA, and that it may clear up some of the problems with the provenance of the aircraft. Please feel free to contact me at Sealand Aviation or at this email address.</p>
<p>Yours faithfully<br />
David Dunstan</p>
<p>Thanks, David.  JTS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/12/15/dc-3-riddle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy News</title>
		<link>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/11/01/happy-news/</link>
		<comments>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/11/01/happy-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicflight.org/hf/?p=848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s a pleasure to witness employees, colleagues and board members realize their aspirations. Congratulations to Mike Young, a Visitor Services employee and Chief Marshal who, upon completion of his FAA Airframe and Powerplant Certificate in August was offered full-time employment by Horizon Airlines. I remember when we inquired of the Everett Community College A&#038;P faculty, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a pleasure to witness employees, colleagues and board members realize their aspirations.  Congratulations to Mike Young, a Visitor Services employee and Chief Marshal who, upon completion of his FAA Airframe and Powerplant Certificate in August was offered full-time employment by Horizon Airlines.  I remember when we inquired of the Everett Community College A&#038;P faculty, &#8220;Do you have a distinguished student who might enjoy part-time employment at HFF?&#8221;, the answer from several was &#8220;Mike Young.&#8221;  Congratulations also go to Mike Lambert, formerly Chief Pilot of Kenmore Air Harbor and a volunteer B-25 Mitchell pilot at HFF.  This Mike has accepted the opportunity to become a pilot for Hawaiian Airlines.  His sterling qualities will serve him well as he suffers the hardships of regular visits to the 50th state.  Finally, for now, congratulations also to a member of our board and most generous volunteer, Bill Ashworth, on his appointment as President of Aviation Partners Boeing.  &#8220;APB&#8221; designs and manufactures winglets to enhance the performance of many models of commercial and private aircraft.  Bill formerly served as President of Aviation Technical Services and Manager of the FAA&#8217;s Seattle Office of Aircraft Certification.</p>
<p>These three talented individuals enrich our organization and hope to continue to do so, after a winter of training and transition.  Young and Ashworth will have their hands full.  A text will arrive from Lambert with the weather report for Waikiki just as we&#8217;re loading up the Mitchell for a December training flight.  He will ask how the anti-icing strategies are playing out.  Pilots are like that.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re proud of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/11/01/happy-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Really Smart Bombs</title>
		<link>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/08/15/smart-bombs/</link>
		<comments>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/08/15/smart-bombs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 04:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicflight.org/hf/?p=817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The linkage connecting B-25D Grumpy&#8217;s cockpit control of the bomb bay doors to the actuating mechanism has required regular maintenance for decades. While the plane may be flown at 290 miles-per-hour with the doors open, it is not a good idea to have them open at take-off as the engine failure scenario goes from bad [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
<p>The linkage connecting B-25D Grumpy&#8217;s cockpit control of the bomb bay doors to the actuating mechanism has required regular maintenance for decades.  While the plane may be flown at 290 miles-per-hour with the doors open, it is not a good idea to have them open at take-off as the engine failure scenario goes from bad to terrible.  Thus, last Friday at the Abbotsford Air Show, Canada&#8217;s largest and one of the best in the world, B-25D Grumpy returned to the hot line without taking to the air.  Field repairs allowed complete closure of the doors pending overhaul of a valve at HFF.  Saturday and Sunday flight performances included two shifts with the famous Abbotsford pyro crew.  One suspects that April and her posse spent adolescent years lighting matches in dark closets.  They enjoy ignition of charges beneath flying aircraft and their skill &#8220;matches&#8221; their passion.  So on several passes, Grumpy and the pyro crew recreated true bombing runs.  One problem.  The bomb-bay doors could not open.  No problem, really.  The veteran, glib announcers explained to the enthusiastic crowd that Grumpy carried ordnance so smart the bomb bays did not need to open.  Any questions? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/08/15/smart-bombs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh Ring!</title>
		<link>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/05/26/oh-ring/</link>
		<comments>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/05/26/oh-ring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 01:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JohnS</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicflight.org/hf/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had a bit of an upset in the Tigercat on the way to Boeing Field the other day. Wings folded nicely on taxi (hint). Locked them in place. Run-up, no problem. About 1,000 psi. &#8220;Time to go&#8221; in a formation take-off with Carter and the Bearcat. The Museum of Flight was expecting us at 10:30 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a bit of an upset in the Tigercat on the way to Boeing Field the other day.  Wings folded nicely on taxi (hint).  Locked them in place.  Run-up, no problem.  About 1,000 psi.  &#8220;Time to go&#8221; in a formation take-off with Carter and the Bearcat.  The Museum of Flight was expecting us at 10:30 for their Centennial of Naval Aviation Day complete with three Hellcat aces.  At 85 I pulled back (gently) on the stick to allow the nose wheel to lift.  Then, a noise.  Not just any noise.  A noise that could be heard over Pratt &#038; Whitney 2800 take-off power about three feet from both ears.  It sounded as if I was sharing the cockpit with a cow and the cow had been shot.  Hydraulics.  Sure enough, the 1,000 psi before take-off now was zero.  What seemed to rile the wounded cow was the lever intended for landing gear retraction.  Gear still in place&#8230; question mark?  I tried to keep my focus and said something to the tower in the downwind.  My Bearcat formation partner checked beneath and reported that the main gear appeared to be 90-degrees to the fuselage.  In other words, &#8220;down and locked.&#8221;  I asked the tower to look for the pink color of hydraulic fluid on the white gear but none was visible.  The navy blue color of the rest of the aircraft provided an impossible backdrop, so in the second circuit I asked my mate to continue to Boeing Field for our mission.  There was nothing more he could do.  One more circuit during which the conversation included &#8220;souls on board&#8221; and &#8220;fuel in minutes.&#8221;  OK, so things aren&#8217;t going well in the cockpit and the tower gives you a little math problem.  How many minutes are in an hour?  I considered flying-off over two hours of fuel but realized that two empty drop tanks and large engines separated the runway from the wing fuel cells, so I asked for a landing clearance.  Minimum air speed with no flaps.  The flaps left for vacation with the landing gear.  Touchdown revealed that the gear had not unlocked (thanks, Grumman) so the principal remaining challenge was to stop with no brakes.  Not tough on a 9,000 foot runway.  I could turn using differential power and made my way back to HFF without incident, but on the downhill slope of Kilo 7 our beloved B-25 appeared before me rather rapidly.  Happily, the emergency hand pump allowed me to recover 200 psi of brakes momentarily, at which point I turned off the engines and allowed the ground crew to tow home the Tigercat in front of a parade of emergency vehicles.  The culprit?  A fifty-cent &#8220;O&#8221; ring in one of the wing-fold actuators.  All the fluid had leaked.  Wings that fold for landing gear is a bad trade&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/05/26/oh-ring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Strikes</title>
		<link>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/03/27/two-strikes/</link>
		<comments>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/03/27/two-strikes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeremyDL</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicflight.org/hf/?p=685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our lovely Bearcat flew forty-six hours last year on a zero-time (i.e., freshly overhauled) engine. Normally a Pratt &#038; Whitney engine will give seamless service for hundreds (sometimes thousands) of hours. We&#8217;ve had that experience with Beaver and Staggerwing engines, and the T-6 engine has not found its way to the list of that plane&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our lovely Bearcat flew forty-six hours last year on a zero-time (<em>i.e.</em>, freshly overhauled) engine.  Normally a Pratt &#038; Whitney engine will give seamless service for hundreds (sometimes thousands) of hours.  We&#8217;ve had that experience with Beaver and Staggerwing engines, and the T-6 engine has not found its way to the list of that plane&#8217;s shortcomings (&#8220;opportunities for improvement&#8221;).  But after one year of air show service, our Bearcat produced somewhat lower compression readings from four of its eighteen cylinders.  This condition might go unnoticed by the pilot for quite some time as the plane is so powerful relative to its weight.  However, it can portend more serious travails so we ordered new cylinders.  Normally that would have gotten us to the end of the annual inspection.  However, a leaky blower seal allowed oil into the wrong places.  Now what to do?  The Centennial of Naval Aviation celebrations in this area plan to feature the Bearcat as the last of the Navy&#8217;s piston fighters and the first demonstration aircraft of the Blue Angels.  I decided to remove the engine so it could be torn down at the overhaul shop for inspection and testing.  This required a first-class effort by the overhaul facility staff and our volunteers.  The engine was removed in two days (you can imagine that a few bits also must be removed to gain access&#8230; come have a look) and will be through the diagnostic phase of teardown by tomorrow.  I have not mentioned the name of the overhaul shop to avoid any inference of inadequacy.  We expect a rebuilt engine in three weeks, in time to practice before the first &#8220;CONA&#8221; (Centennial of Naval Aviation) event.</p>
<p>So in the case of this engine, two strikes and it&#8217;s out!  The Mariners get three but they remain at field elevation.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/03/27/two-strikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Favorite Maneuver</title>
		<link>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/02/17/my-favorite-maneuver/</link>
		<comments>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/02/17/my-favorite-maneuver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 01:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeremyDL</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicflight.org/hf/?p=666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mig-29 test flights provided multiple reasons to smile. I&#8217;ve been asked to recount memorable moments. For now, let me share the return from high altitude tests near Moses Lake. As we completed our descent near Stevens Pass, fuel was adequate to practice aerobatics on a &#8220;monkey-see, monkey-do&#8221; basis. Some of these are presented in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mig-29 test flights provided multiple reasons to smile.  I&#8217;ve been asked to recount memorable moments.  For now, let me share the return from high altitude tests near Moses Lake.</p>
<p>As we completed our descent near Stevens Pass, fuel was adequate to practice aerobatics on a &#8220;monkey-see, monkey-do&#8221; basis.  Some of these are presented in a You Tube sequence.  </p>
<p>The Mig-29 will begin and complete a loop in afterburner at 250 knots.  Speeds above 250 require altitude of at least 10,000, so that is where this maneuver began.  Enormous thrust won the battle with weight.  However, the afterburner loop can be timed using the downward track of the fuel arrows, so the more you do, the sooner you must go home.  In contrast, the Mig-29 loops beautifully in idle at 500 knots.  Get up to speed, retard the throttles and pull the stick in relative quiet.  No bad habits.  Now do it again while holding a camera.  G-forces make it difficult to hit the &#8220;start&#8221; button.  Stay steady over the top.  Not too slow.  Drop the nose.  Pull through.  No worries.  Time for home.</p>
<p>For me, a low thrust, circular loop between 10 and 15,000 feet near Mount Baker has become a favorite memory.  Perhaps its glow will endure until the fuel bill arrives.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/02/17/my-favorite-maneuver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mig-29</title>
		<link>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/01/24/mig-29/</link>
		<comments>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/01/24/mig-29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 03:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeremyDL</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicflight.org/hf/?p=624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I joined former Air Force test pilot Doug Russell in the cockpit of the Mig-29UB Fulcrum (&#8220;UB&#8221; is the designation for two-place) HFF acquired about six years ago. Since then, Tim Morgan and I have had the pleasure of partnership in its restoration. Now some worry that HFF might change focus from Spitfires to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday I joined former Air Force test pilot Doug Russell in the cockpit of the Mig-29UB Fulcrum (&#8220;UB&#8221; is the designation for two-place) HFF acquired about six years ago.  Since then, Tim Morgan and I have had the pleasure of partnership in its restoration.  Now some worry that HFF might change focus from Spitfires to Migs, but that will not happen on my watch.  We undertook this project to demonstrate a small foundation could restore to top standards, one of the most advanced and elegant aircraft of the modern era.  That we did is tribute to the collection of aviation devotees at Arlington Field (in particular, the employees of Morgan Aircraft Restorations), enlightened civil servants from the FAA (who will remain nameless to avoid career implications), talented and hard-working foreign nationals who used vacations from jobs maintaining Mig-29s to work on ours, and a Chinese judge who knew what to do.</p>
<p>In April, 2006, I signed papers authorizing our shipping company to take control of our Mig in Ukraine for transit to the Port of Tacoma.  That company decided it did not want to transport a complete Mig-29 on one ship on one ocean, perhaps to avoid hijacking by terrorists.  Whatever the motivation, the engines and wings crossed the Atlantic while the fuselage headed east for the Pacific.  Racked on deck in a steel frame, it seemed the bow sprint of the first order.  When off-loaded in Hong Kong for transfer to another vessel, a customs official seized our fuselage as an undocumented implement of war.  Ranking officials of Hong Kong advised that I would never see it again unless I swam with the fish near a breakwater then under construction.  Nonetheless, court dates came and we were prepared.  A judge assigned at random ruled the aircraft had been properly demilitarized before it left Ukraine.  Key to the outcome was de-registration of the aircraft in Ukraine and re-registration in the United States to Historic Flight Foundation, a non-profit institution, before shipment.  So the customs official had acted reasonably because the shipper&#8217;s paperwork was flawed, but the fuselage should be released because it was not an implement of war.  The process required twenty-three months and just a few dollars.  Collecting fine art must be simpler.</p>
<p>So our pristine Mig-29 awaits your inspection at our Restoration Hangar.  We will conduct Phase I test flights during the balance of January and February to fulfill the conditions of the Certificate of Airworthiness.    </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/01/24/mig-29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cabin Fever</title>
		<link>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/01/17/cabin-fever/</link>
		<comments>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/01/17/cabin-fever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 05:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JeremyDL</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historicflight.org/hf/?p=619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re doing what we can to survive January. Last weekend our good friend Lyle Jansma delivered the first of two cockpit-style flight simulators. The software allows advanced operations of our entire fleet of aircraft with Paine Field circa 1943 as the backdrop. The second simulator arrived yesterday. The next step is an Internet gaming club [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re doing what we can to survive January.</p>
<p>Last weekend our good friend Lyle Jansma delivered the first of two cockpit-style flight simulators.  The software allows advanced operations of our entire fleet of aircraft with Paine Field circa 1943 as the backdrop.  The second simulator arrived yesterday.  The next step is an Internet gaming club such that the effort invested in this wonderful system can be shared worldwide and by doing so, connect HFF with many new friends.  This project has been a two-museum collaboration with Heritage Flight Museum of Bellingham.  Good show.</p>
<p>Next Saturday, the 22nd, John Posson of Stallion 51 Corporation will offer a P-51 ground school and formation briefing.  Twenty-five have enrolled in this course, which is intended for anyone wishing to know more about the fighter many regard as the best of WWII.  Weather permitting, we will resume B-25 pilot training on Sunday, the 23rd.  Four candidates will train on the 23rd and the 30th.</p>
<p>On Friday, the 28th and Saturday, the 29th, we will feature &#8220;Nose Art&#8221; through a social presentation with wine (on the 28th) and a full-blown history seminar with coffee (on the 29th).  Our guest presenters from Victory Girl Studio will cover the origins of nose art in WWI, the &#8220;golden age&#8221; of nose art in WWII,  it&#8217;s decline during the Korean and Vietnam Wars, changes in regulations in the 70s to proscribe personal markings, and revision of regulations in the 80s to allow it again, with examples of nose art in Desert Storm Iraq.</p>
<p>With any luck, the above and a bit of flying will get us to February.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://historicflight.org/hf/2011/01/17/cabin-fever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

